2026 Voting Research

West Covina ballot measures — November 3, 2026

My vote summary

View full research table with details →

Purpose: Track my positions on the 17 measures on my West Covina ballot. The last column flags only measures that create or open the door to new taxes or taxpayer-funded obligations. Bond debt service is noted but not counted as a tax.
# Prop/Measure Title or Description My Vote Why Creates Future Tax/Obligation
1Prop 1Housing Affordability Bonds ($11.25B — only $1.25B for veterans)NoCreates more state debt; state already mishandles billions in homelessness funds that are not accounted for; should repurpose existing funds and reduce deficit firstN — no new tax, but repaid from existing taxpayer-funded General Fund (~$500–600M/yr for 25 yrs)
2Prop 2Increase state rainy day fund reserve capYesNo new tax; reserve withdrawals are accounted for and traceable through the General Fund budget processN
3Prop 3Make high-income tax permanentYes/No (on the fence)Extends an existing tax rather than creating a new one, but California already mismanages General Fund dollars and a permanent tax removes a promised sunsetY — extends existing tax indefinitely
4Prop 4Allow public campaign financingNoTaxpayer money should not fund politician campaign spending; opens door to mismanaged public fundsY — opens door for taxpayer-funded campaign programs
5Prop 5Change recall replacement processNoThe people should always have a say as to who takes officeN
6Prop 37Middle-income homebuyer loan program ($25B revenue bonds)YesObligation is on bondholders and borrowers, not taxpayers directlyN — self-supporting; repaid by borrowers
7Prop 38Immunology medical research bonds ($8.4B)NoIndustry profits are in the billions; AI is advancing this research aloneN — no new tax; ~$500–600M/yr General Fund debt service for 20 yrs
8Prop 39Voter ID requirementYesIf you need an ID to drive, enter the country, and travel, you should be required to show ID to voteN — adds election admin costs, no new tax
9Prop 40One-time billionaire wealth taxNoToo loosely guarded and will likely fail when challenged; Prop 42 will likely pass and cancel itY — creates new 5% tax on assets over $1B
10Prop 41Limit new special taxes / require auditsYesNo blank checks; regulates spendingN — makes new special taxes harder and requires audits
11Prop 42Ban new personal property/wealth taxesYesBlocks any new state taxes against personal property and retirement assets — protections for the working classN — blocks future taxes
12Prop 43Raise local special tax vote threshold to 2/3YesBack to the way it should have beenN — makes local taxes harder to pass
13Prop 44Require clinics spend 90% on program servicesYesHealthcare industry already highly profitable; redirects existing funding to direct patient services and may open specialized, lower-overhead clinicsN — redirects existing tax revenue, no new tax or patient fee
14Prop 45Speed up CEQA environmental reviewYesDoes not change the review process other than deadlinesN — process change only, no new tax or fee
15Measure ALA County public safety binding arbitrationNoUnions do not represent the voter majority and are only for dues-paying interests; removes voter oversight from elected officialsN — not a tax, but could increase county labor costs
16Measure ELA County ethics commission charter amendmentNoCreates new charter-protected departments with limited voter oversight and locks spending into the charterN — no new tax; only directs existing county revenue
17Measure UPPasadena City College bond ($485M, no tax-rate increase)NoIt's a never-ending tax that should expire when Measure P is paid offN — extends existing $9/$100k assessed value rate
—Measure PRKLA City Recreation and Parks budget charter amendment (City of LA only; not on West Covina ballot)Yes (if on ballot)Parks are neglectedN — no new tax; reallocates existing General Fund revenue
← Back to RMS Consults